RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02026 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be allowed to transfer her Post-9/11 Montgomery GI Bill benefits to her dependents. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She applied for the Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits in Aug 09 but was never notified of her eligibility. On 5 Apr 11, she was finally approved and received notification from the Department of Veterans Affairs. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A. _________________ ______________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 2 Jul 84, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force, with a Total Active Federal Military Service Date (TAFMSD) of 2 Jul 84. On 1 Aug 04, the applicant retired from active duty and was credited with 20 years and 29 days of total active service. According to documentation provided by the applicant, on 5 Apr 11, she received a Certificate of Eligibility from the Department of Veterans Affairs indicating she is entitled to benefits under the Post-9/11 GI Bill. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. The applicant retired effective 1 Aug 04 and the program for the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) started on 1 Aug 09. Based on the applicant’s retirement date, she retired before the TEB program was established. An applicant cannot obtain approval for a program that did not exist at the time of their separation/retirement. The Post-9/11 GI Bill, Chapter 33 became effective 1 Aug 09. Any member of the Armed Forces who, on or after 1 Aug 09, is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, had at least six years of service on the date of election may transfer unused Post-9/11 benefits to their dependents. The complete DPSIT evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 8 Sep 14 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D). ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-02026 in Executive Session on 23 Mar 15, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 12 May 14, w/atch. Exhibit B. Applicant's Available Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIT, dated 27 May 14. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 8 Sep 14. 3